|
|
No. |
|
24. This paper is clearly of a few weeks' later
date. Its place in the volume was
unluckily altered at the last moment
in consequence of the reference in
the despatch of Bonner and Cavendish, 14 Feb. (No. 303), to a former
letter of Jan. 3, speaking of the
rumor of the king of Sweden's
death. |
|
108, 1. 2, "here." Melancthon was then at
Wittenberg. See No. 112. |
|
164 ii., at end, for "Pp. 3" read "Pp. 2." |
|
166, 1. 6, for "when" read "where." |
|
170, 1. 2, for "talked very big" read "had a
long conversation." |
|
213. See Vol. VIII., No. 77, which is really
of the year 1536. Ric. Lyst was
presented by Mr. Wendy to the
vicarage of St. Dunstan's in the
West on the 5th Feb. 1535 [6]. See
Newcourt, I. 337. |
|
226 (35), for "30 June," in date, read
"30 Jan." |
|
230, margin, for "R. M." read "B. M." |
|
246 (6), for "Pp. 9" read "Pp. 10;" and
(10), for "Pp. 8" read "Pp. 9." |
|
251, ll. 2, 3. Remove the comma after
"Raynolds" and place it after
"William" (the name being Raynolds William). |
|
282, ll. 2, 3, "four bishops and as many
abbots." For the names of these
bishops and abbots see No. 284. |
|
297. The writer of this letter is not unlikely
to be Ghinucci, and the mutilated
name on the second line may have
been "domino Ricar[dino]." See
Vol. IX., 728, where the mutilated
passages at the beginning seem to
correspond with the tenor of this
letter. The name, however, would
appear to be Robert Ricardine, not
Richard. See Vol. IX., No. 1021,
note. |
|
317, 1. 2, for "hers" read "his." |
|
344, for "Yorkshire" read "Lanc., York
dioc." |
|
353. The lacunæ in ll. 1, 2, may be supplied
thus:—"which I sent [by Peter
Molle], the merchant of Hamburg,
bearingdate the 3d [of this present]."
See No. 240. |
|
No. |
|
364 (1), for "Pp. 33" (p. 143) read "Pp.
31. In parchment cover with title." |
|
368, p. 146, ll. 3, 5, for "Brescia" read
"Bresse" (in the original Italian
"La Brescia"). |
|
376–7. The real date of these letters seems
to be in the beginning of Sept. 1535.
See Vol. IX., Nos. 232, 365, 391. |
|
392 (5). Insert after the date "Del. Westm.,
1 Feb." |
|
392 (28). The P.S. is slightly mutilated. |
|
392 (48), l. 11, for "Bethen" read "Blethyn." |
|
392 (49). "London" dioc. So on the Patent roll. The place must be South
Normanton in Derbyshire. See
Valor. Eccl. iii. 179. |
|
419, 1. 7, for "Knygnton" read "Knyght." |
|
419, l. 8, for "bp. of London" read "Dr.
London" (see No. 411). The
title in the original Latin "D. London" is in itself ambiguous. |
|
437, l. 15, for "through" read "into." |
|
437, l. 18, for "duke of Milan" read "duke
[of Savoy]." |
|
447, l. 2, for "for" read "from." |
|
476, l. 1, for "Paisley" read "Prisley." |
|
561. "I have not written to you for a long
time, having been absent from my
garrison." This is inconsistent with
the fact that Nos. 493 and 540 are
by the same writer, besides an intermediate letter of the 20 March
referred to in the latter. But it
appears by No. 493 that Tovar had
just returned from the court of the
Queen Regent on the 17 March, and
this document seems to be of the
same year. The exact words, however, used by the writer, are in the
original French: "que non vous
ay escript de mes novelles, pour avoir
este de long tamps de ma garnison;"
which apparently mean only, "I did
not write to you any news, because
I was so long away from my
garrison." |
|
565, at end, for "p. 1" read "pp. 3." |
|
571, for "John Bruce," in heading, read
"Robert Braie." |
|
No. |
|
586, p. 231, l. 20. Dele comma after Udalrichus. |
|
601, p. 244, l. 26, for "of whom I lately
wrote" read "of whom I have written
before" (dontjey cy devant escript). |
|
606. The real date of this letter is 11 Sept.
1535, i.e., Saturday after the Nativity
of our Lady (not Lady Day in
March). See Vol. IX., Nos. 377,
388. This correction is important.
It appears that lord Leonard, coming
over from Ireland with his prisoner
lord Thomas Fitzgerald, had reached
Fawley ("Fallesley") in Northamptonshire by Friday the 10th Sept.,
and that they were with the King at
Winchester on the following Monday,
the 13th. |
|
597 (9). After "S. B." add reference "Pat.
p. 1, m. 2. |
|
623. This document belongs to the year
1537. |
|
659. This letter seems to be misdated by the
writer at least by a day, as Pole
writes from Venice the same day
(No. 658), and Morison, who was
also at Venice, writes the same day
"Mr. Pole departs tomorrow to
Padua" (No. 661). |
|
721 (3), for "pp. 4" read "pp. 6. With title
page: Ep'atus Landaff. Slightly
mutilated." |
|
728, p. 309, l. 9, for "my lord Secretary" read
"the lord Secretary" (i.e., Erskine,
Secretary of Scotland). |
|
731, l. 4, for "commendatory" read "com
mander." |
|
754. This letter is of the year 1524, and has
already been noticed, Vol. IV.,
App. 6. |
|
748, footnote (p. 314). Supply No. 699 (left
blank.) See p. 289, near the bottom
of the page. |
|
750, l. 2, for "2 April" read "28 April." |
|
752, l. 35, "the brother of lord Montague."
Doubtless Sir Geoffrey Pole. |
|
765, l. 2, for "lord Barners' son" read "lord
Barnes' sons" (i.e., Humphrey, Jas.,
and Geo. Bourchier, illegitimate sons
of John Bourchier lord Berners, who
died in 1533.) |
|
775 (26), for "22 April" read "20 April." |
|
777 (10, 14). These commissions would
appear to be of later date, as Fitzwilliam was not Admiral in April
1536; yet if they be of the year
1537 lord Darcy's name could only
have been retained by a mistake of
the clerk. |
|
790. This letter is of a later date, as Kingston was not Controller of the Household in May 1536. |
|
830. This letter must be of another year, as
Brion was with the army in Savoy
in May 1536. |
|
831, last line, for "from thence" read
"thither." |
|
860, l. 1. for "ambassador's" read "ambassadors'." |
|
860, l. 3 from end, for "Cranmer (?)" read
"Foxe." |
|
885. This letter is of the year 1535. |
|
902. This letter is out of place, as it was
written before lord Rochford's death.
It was probably written on the
16 May, a few hours after No. 890. |
|
908, line 4 from end, and 909, l. 4. The lady
who had charge of Anne Boleyn was
probably Mrs. Coffin. See No. 798. |
|
947, p. 396. "Two Catholic bishops." The
rumor referred to Tunstall and
Clerk, bp. of Bath. See Pole's
letter, No. 1093. |
|
972. For the text of this brief, so far as it
relates to Henry VIII., see Raynaldus, xxxii. 406. |
|
987. This letter is of the year 1535, referring
to the last illness of George lord
Abergavenny. |
|
997. This letter is of the year 1534. Christopher Plummer was arrested and
sent to the Tower on the 27 May in
that year. See Vol. VII., No. 828,
where his name is inaccurately given
as "Chas.," and Vol. VIII., No.
1001. |
|
1015 (12). The S.B. is mutilated and partly
illegible. |
|
1015 (20). Before reference to Pat. insert
"P.S." |
|
1015 (29). The P.S. is mutilated and partly
illegible. |
|
1057. This letter is probably of the year
1534, when the King went to Waltham early in June. A week later
the Earl was at his place of Stansted,
in Essex. See Vol. VII., No. 822. |
|
1064. This letter must be of the year 1537.
It is true that in that year Sandes
had been at Guisnes for more than
two months before 5 June. But in
1536 he had been residing for some
time at the Vine, in Hampshire, and
he had a licence granted him to
remain still in England on the
25 May. See No. 1015 (23). |
|
1088. This document is probably a year or
two earlier. The mutilation of the
endorsement makes it impossible to
ascertain its precise import. |
|
1091, heading, for "to" read "and." |
|
1178, l. 2, for "Arnsteley" read "Arusteley." |
|
1244. This appears to be a copy of No. 251. |
|
No. |
|
1246. This document, though connected with
the first suppression under the Act
of 1536, must have been written after
the birth of prince Edward in 1537. |
|
1247. Supply "R. O." in margin. |
|
1250. At end. Supply "Pp. 2." |
|
1256. (2, 11, 14, 24). Insert "P.S." before
"Pat." in each of these grants.—lb.
(53). This commission has been incorrectly enrolled, and is probably of
the year 1537, as Fitzwilliam was
not Admiral until 16 August 1536. |
